Valid concerns

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission held its latest public hearing on the proposed new units at Plant Vogtle last week. There has been a lot said, both pro and con. Local citizens, by and large, support the expansion because they have seen the positive economic and social effects the existing plant has had on the community. In addition, they have been impressed by the safe and efficient operation of the facility since its startup.

Nonetheless, valid questions have been raised during the hearings by genuinely concerned citizens. Those questions relate to the safety and security of the plant's operation and the problem of the disposal of nuclear waste. Most protesters would prefer more emphasis on conservation and the increased use of alternative energy sources. But, protesting the expansion of nuclear-generated electricity is useless unless you can come up with practical alternatives.

Unfortunately, though there is a lot of interest in bio-fuels and wind and solar energy programs, there is not much out there in the way of affordable options for the average homeowner. Solar energy systems which would significantly reduce electricity bills are too expensive for most families. Only those who are both very wealthy and seriously concerned about the environment could even consider such an investment. Currently available solar panel systems, for instance, would take several decades to pay for themselves in energy savings.

We think that the state and federal government should partner with the utilities to find ways to reduce the cost of alternative power systems for homeowners. If the return on investment could be increased to a more reasonable level, we believe many developers would take advantage of incentives and include energy conservation systems in the construction of new homes and the renovation of older ones.

It's time to take a new look at this problem. It's important to all of us - and our children.